Monday, February 8, 2010

No cause for applause

If you were at Murrayfield at the weekend you would have been part of the minute's silence observed in memory of Bill McLaren, a man who did so much to preserve the spirit of Rugby Union in his popular TV commentaries.

When McLaren was at the microphone it was a commentary, not a conversation between commentator and pundit interspersed with pitch-side analysis and interviews. As spectators we indulged in our own analysis and argument. Today all that is done for us.

If, on the other hand, you, like me, were part of the crowd watching England play Wales at Twickenham on Saturday, you would have been invited by the DJ-style announcer who is so in love with his own voice, to show your appreciation of McLaren with applause. I did not applaud. I applaud a great sporting moment, a fine singer a funny comedian, a great speech, but I do not applaud in death.

Come Remembrance Day when the clock strikes eleven I do not feel the urge to applaud in memory of the millions who died in wartime. I would not want to stand in the street in Wootton Bassett and applaud the funeral corteges for fallen servicemen and women in Afghanistan. In fact sometimes people don't applaud and sometimes they do. In this clip people maintain silence until (3.15 minutes on the clip) a big chap with a white shirt, black tie and tattooed arms begins clapping robustly and others follow.

The problem is that as a society we no longer know how to handle death. Respect has become an issue and we are angered by those who fail to show it: a minority in football crowds, for example. One way of drowning out the disrespectful minority is to applaud. Applause is an example of flocking behaviour that can be set off by a single individual - the same one, perhaps, who would start a Mexican wave.

This may be a feature of soccer crowds; but it does not, or at least did not, affect rugby crowds. Rugby crowds are still capable of observing a minute's silence - just. I say "just" because the rugby union crowd is changing, manipulated by commercialism.

Rugby matches used to be great singing occasions, as did football cup finals. I can remember when the Twickenham crowd sang Jerusalem during the game. Today they manage a few lines of Swing Low, Sweet Chariot. On the way to the England v Wales match, the England fans would sing a song, then call on the Welsh who never failed to do likewise. Not any more. As we made our way to the match on Saturday the only response from a Welshman came from one of our own group who sang a fine and and faultlessly delivered Land of My Fathers in his native tongue.

On Saturday a big choir came out on to the Twickenham pitch and sang Jerusalem before the game. But the crowd didn't sing along much. Perhaps some do not know the words but these could be displayed on the big screens.

Singing, sadly, seems to be on a decline on great sporting occasions - as opposed to abusive chanting which is something else. Some football fans may think it is amusing to compile a verse on the latest sexual adventures of John Terry, the captain of Chelsea. That is a reflection of the cruelty of people who don't know how to behave towards would-be role models who also don't know how to behave.

When England scored their last try that sealed victory in a closely fought match, a few of the crowd near me started up the mocking football chant: "You're not singing any more." That didn't use to happen. Traditionally there has been banter between fans at rugby matches but, for the most part, it is harmless stuff, not underpinned with the kind of tribalism you get in football.

Another thing - and I guess this is fairly harmless - there seems to be a growing fondness for declaring group identity at these matches in fancy dress. On Saturday I saw blokes dressed as bunnies, some in Elvis wigs and some with flame hair wigs. This trend seems to have been imported from cricket crowds. This eagerness to suppress our individuality behind such themed uniformity betrays a deep psychological need to belong (says this armchair psychologist).

More rugby old fart blogs on remarkably similar lines (I forget from match to match) can be found here, here, here and here.

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, October 18, 2007

Rugby v football

Well it's Thursday and there hasn't been a phone call promising a day to remember at the Rugby Union World Cup final. It's too much to hope. World Cup finals are reserved for A-list clients in corporate entertainment and I doubt if I'm even C-list.

Besides I prefer to watch my rugby with the same lads who have been getting together for Twickenham matches for the past 30 years. The routine is always the same. A few beers before the match, always at the same pub in the same few square feet at one end of the bar, then down to the bus and a sing song on the top deck all the way to the ground. Always the same songs.

When we were in our early twenties we used to look at the "old farts" in their Barbour raincoats and wonder whether we would turn out like that - and we did. But we still have a lot of fun.

The routine changed a bit when they built the new stand and got rid of the old West Stand bar where a chap in a sheepskin coat we used to know as Beastie would climb on to the stanchions and go through his Beastie routine.

I like the home internationals and the odd trip to Ireland or France because its an opportunity for blokes to be blokes, tell a few jokes, have a few debates that never get too serious, drink a bit more than we should and sometimes fall over although there is always a magical homing instinct that somehow transports you back to your doorstep.

One of the lads, Simon, sent over a great link to this rugby inspired piece of viral marketing. It made me laugh anyway. Simon's is the Philanderer blog listed down the side of mine. Rugby tours, golf, tours, what's the difference? As he explains here, some things never change.

I can't see England winning on Saturday but then I couldn't see them beating the Australians or France. I don't think my old ticker can stand another tight match. But another Springbok walk over is also too shameful to contemplate. As Stuart, another rugby mate, said after South Africa's 36-0 beating of England earlier in the tournament, "England were lucky to score nil" on that occasion.

Could England walk over South Africa? I very much doubt it. But we can dream. How about 21-0 to England at half time? Even in that unlikely event I would still be biting my nails with some justification.

I'm not superstitious but some people believe that things go in threes. Suppose the England football team has kicked off a run that includes the loss of the world cup final this weekend and Lewis Hamilton losing out in Brazil? I'm really very very sorry for planting that thought but a worry shared is a worry halved so there you have it. Go England!

Labels: , , , , , ,

SFL - improve performance through the implementation of an authentic and measurable leadership culture